Who is affected

  • Creative teams choosing AI tools that embed Content Credentials.
  • Agencies building evidence workflows.
  • Legal teams assessing what provenance proves.

What triggers the rule

  • You want machine-readable origin data attached to assets.
  • Your platforms detect AI indicators like C2PA manifests.
  • Your clients require provenance trails.

What does not trigger it / exceptions

  • C2PA does not apply to assets produced with tools that do not embed credentials.
  • Credentials do not survive workflows that strip metadata.

Scenario table

ScenarioOutcomeWhy
AI tool embeds Content CredentialsDisclosure recommendedPlatforms may auto-detect AI indicators; still publish with a native label to be certain.
Asset edited in a pipeline that strips metadataHuman review requiredProvenance signal is lost; your manifest becomes the only evidence.

Required action

  1. Prefer tools and pipelines that preserve Content Credentials.
  2. Keep an internal AI Usage Manifest per asset — provenance metadata is not guaranteed to survive.
  3. Never claim credentials prove authorship or truth.

Practical marketing examples

  • A generated image with a C2PA manifest survives export and gets auto-labeled on a platform.
  • The same image resized through a CMS loses the manifest — label manually and record internally.

Relation to platform policy

Meta and TikTok detect industry AI indicators including C2PA manifests to apply labels automatically. Detection is not guaranteed for every tool and edit chain.

Not sure which scenario matches your asset?

Run the free check — result, wording and sources in under a minute.

Check this scenario

Primary sources

Methodology: Disclara answers are generated from a versioned rule set citing primary sources, reviewed by humans. Information on this page is not legal advice. See sources & methodology and rule changelog.