Who is affected

  • Marketing teams that must evidence AI use decisions.
  • Agencies handing assets between tools and clients.
  • Compliance teams auditing campaign history.

What triggers the rule

  • Assets are produced in tools that embed credentials.
  • Clients or platforms request provenance data.

What does not trigger it / exceptions

  • Screenshots, transcodes and CMS exports can drop credentials.
  • Credentials describe process, not the truth of claims in the content.

Scenario table

ScenarioOutcomeWhy
Verify an asset before deliveryDisclosure recommendedChecking credentials is fast and strengthens the evidence chain.
Asset published through a stripping pipelineNo disclosure identifiedNo provenance signal survives — rely on your internal manifest, not metadata.

Required action

  1. Verify credentials with contentcredentials.org/verify before delivery.
  2. Export credentials where the workflow supports them.
  3. Record the verification result in your evidence report.

Practical marketing examples

  • A generated background carries an “AI-generated” action in its credential history.
  • A client asks for audit proof — the Evidence Report cites the manifest and the internal decision.

Relation to platform policy

Platforms including Meta and TikTok read AI indicators such as C2PA manifests when deciding to apply labels automatically.

Not sure which scenario matches your asset?

Run the free check — result, wording and sources in under a minute.

Check this scenario

Primary sources

Methodology: Disclara answers are generated from a versioned rule set citing primary sources, reviewed by humans. Information on this page is not legal advice. See sources & methodology and rule changelog.