Who is affected

  • Podcast, social and video teams using synthetic narration.
  • Agencies producing multilingual voice-overs.
  • Legal teams handling voice-cloning consent.

What triggers the rule

  • Cloned voice of a real person.
  • Realistic synthetic narration.
  • Voice alteration making someone appear to say something they did not.

What does not trigger it / exceptions

  • Obviously robotic or stylised voice where no one could assume a real recording.

Scenario table

ScenarioOutcomeWhy
Generic synthetic voice-over on real footageDisclosure recommendedThe voice is synthetic; disclose it specifically to stay truthful and platform-safe.
Cloned voice of the CEOHuman review requiredIdentifiable person: consent, approval and wording need a human owner.
AI denoising of a recorded interviewNo disclosure identifiedRestoration does not change what was said; record it in the manifest.

Required action

  1. Disclose synthetic voice in the platform flow and caption where sensible.
  2. Obtain written consent for cloned voices.
  3. Record voice model, scope and approver.

Practical marketing examples

  • “Narration is AI-generated.”
  • “Voice cloned with the speaker’s consent for accessibility.”

Relation to platform policy

EU AI Act Article 50(4) requires deployers to disclose realistic AI-generated or manipulated image, audio and video resembling real persons, objects, places or events. Use the platform’s native label and keep your own evidence record.

Not sure which scenario matches your asset?

Run the free check — result, wording and sources in under a minute.

Check this scenario

Primary sources

Methodology: Disclara answers are generated from a versioned rule set citing primary sources, reviewed by humans. Information on this page is not legal advice. See sources & methodology and rule changelog.