Article 50 for marketing teams
Direct answer
Marketing teams should assess Article 50 at asset level. Record what AI generated or changed, decide whether the result is a deepfake or covered public-interest text, apply a clear disclosure where required, and retain the sources and human approval behind the decision.
Applies when
- Realistic synthetic people, products, places or events.
- Manipulated audio or video that can appear authentic.
- Covered public-interest text.
Doesn't apply when
- AI involvement alone does not make every marketing asset a covered deepfake.
Worked decision
Example
Generated lifestyle scene around a product
Human review required
Assess whether it resembles a real scene and would falsely appear authentic.
Next steps
Required action
- Add an Article 50 gate to creative review.
- Use component-specific wording.
- Keep the source, rule version and approver.
Publishing layer
Platform differences
Law, platform and client layers
Article 50 duties and platform policies are separate layers. A platform label can help communicate AI use, but it does not by itself establish compliance with the AI Act.
Evidence
Source
Freshness and accountability
Last verified
Applies from 2026-08-02 · Last reviewed 2026-09-12 · Current
Run this exact scenario
Relevant content, AI-use and platform inputs are preselected. Confirm the remaining facts before relying on the result.
Who is affected
- In-house brand and communications teams.
- Social, content and performance marketers.
- Reviewers approving AI-assisted assets.
More scenarios
| Scenario | Outcome | Why |
|---|---|---|
| AI avatar presented as a real spokesperson | Disclosure required | A realistic synthetic person can meet the deepfake trigger. |
Practical marketing examples
- Generated location disclosed within the creative.
- Virtual presenter identified before the endorsement begins.
Related pages
Disclara separates binding law, platform policy, client policy, technical provenance and recommended wording. Information on this page is not legal advice. See editorial policy.
